http://www.thecfl.us/forum/ |
|
| 2014 Draft Discussio http://www.thecfl.us/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3631 |
Page 16 of 16 |
| Author: | Stretch [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quoteb6dfae2="TurfToe"]Sorry for the holdup, just got a chance to browse briefly. Need to look at what's left and decide on a trade offer. Again, if I've inconvenienced anyone, it was my pleasure.  [/quoteb6dfae2]TICK tick TICK tick TICK tick TICK... |
|
| Author: | fantastic flying froggies [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hmmm, Alex TONG ??? 
|
|
| Author: | TurfToe [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote75561ea="Stretch"][quote75561ea="TurfToe"]Sorry for the holdup, just got a chance to browse briefly. Need to look at what's left and decide on a trade offer. Again, if I've inconvenienced anyone, it was my pleasure. [/quote75561ea]TICK tick TICK tick TICK tick TICK...[/quote75561ea] Apparently you missed my previous post, so here's one just for you... PISS OFF. 
|
|
| Author: | nikkelbak [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 2:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i've changed my mind... ...after thinking it over, i don't think we should change a thing about how the draft is run next season, why would we want to give up all this drama  not to omany threads have over 15 pages, most of this stuff is very funny. |
|
| Author: | timmynausea [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 3:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
If anything, I actually think we should get the utility up early in the future like we did this year. The ability to start the draft early and have extra time to work out trades made the first round a lot of fun, I think. |
|
| Author: | wademoore [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 3:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote2781f30="timmynausea"]If anything, I actually think we should get the utility up early in the future like we did this year. The ability to start the draft early and have extra time to work out trades made the first round a lot of fun, I think.[/quote2781f30] Just to step in - I would not be supportive of continueing to draw out the 1st round in the future. |
|
| Author: | Stretch [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 4:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote5d7bf16="fantastic flying froggies"]Hmmm, Alex TONG ??? [/quote5d7bf16]Every time he punts, we'll be playing the Tong song to the tune of the Thong Song. Tong tong tong tong TONG! My scout fell in love with him. I figured I'd take a flier... My scout estimates he'll be an 70-85 punter. If he's wrong, I'll sign another one. |
|
| Author: | Raven Hawk [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 4:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote1f329a1="Stretch"][quote1f329a1="fantastic flying froggies"]Hmmm, Alex TONG ??? [/quote1f329a1]Every time he punts, we'll be playing the Tong song to the tune of the Thong Song. Tong tong tong tong TONG! My scout fell in love with him. I figured I'd take a flier... My scout estimates he'll be an 70-85 punter. If he's wrong, I'll sign another one.[/quote1f329a1] Ummm, why even scout a punter that low on the list? |
|
| Author: | Shooter [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quotea8110e1="Raven Hawk"]Gus Schanne is a red flag player, but still - to get the 2nd best rated (understandably by opinion only) in the 6th round? I think it was worth a risk. I didn't actually scout him. Did anybody else scout him?[/quotea8110e1] My scout had him listed as very overated. My scout is listed as good for O-Line. I did like some of his orange bars though. |
|
| Author: | JJ Smitty [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Fargo, where are you..?? |
|
| Author: | Shooter [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote916afb7="JJ Smitty"]Fargo, where are you..??[/quote916afb7] Looks like their time has expired. Their biggest needs were listed as OLB & CB. They drafted a SLB last round but that still only leaves 4 LB on their roster with only 1 being an OLB. I suggest Jon Hudson who is the next WLB on the board. |
|
| Author: | JJ Smitty [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quoteb3d196f="Shooter"][quoteb3d196f="JJ Smitty"]Fargo, where are you..??[/quoteb3d196f] Looks like their time has expired. Their biggest needs were listed as OLB & CB. They drafted a SLB last round but that still only leaves 4 LB on their roster with only 1 being an OLB. I suggest Jon Hudson who is the next WLB on the board.[/quoteb3d196f] i second.. |
|
| Author: | Taco [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote679986d="Shooter"][quote679986d="JJ Smitty"]Fargo, where are you..??[/quote679986d] Looks like their time has expired. Their biggest needs were listed as OLB & CB. They drafted a SLB last round but that still only leaves 4 LB on their roster with only 1 being an OLB. I suggest Jon Hudson who is the next WLB on the board.[/quote679986d] Sounds good to me. I'll make the selection. Thanks, Shooter! |
|
| Author: | baildog [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 7:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sorry guys, insert lame excuse here. Let the flogging continue |
|
| Author: | TurfToe [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 7:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quotee21daf2="Taco"][quotee21daf2="Shooter"][quotee21daf2="JJ Smitty"]Fargo, where are you..??[/quotee21daf2] Looks like their time has expired. Their biggest needs were listed as OLB & CB. They drafted a SLB last round but that still only leaves 4 LB on their roster with only 1 being an OLB. I suggest Jon Hudson who is the next WLB on the board.[/quotee21daf2] Sounds good to me. I'll make the selection. Thanks, Shooter![/quotee21daf2] He was drafted by the Rounders last year and the Rounders said he wasn't good enough to sign. Maybe the second time's a charm and he'll boom big time. |
|
| Author: | Raven Hawk [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 7:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Turn those green lights on and let's get this thing done with. 
|
|
| Author: | Meatholes [ Thu Jul 12, 2007 7:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
IT IS THE 7TH F--KN ROUND, JUST PICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Step 1 - Load Utility Step 2 - Turn It On Step 3 - We are finally done
|
|
| Author: | Stretch [ Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quotee6448fb="Raven Hawk"] Ummm, why even scout a punter that low on the list?[/quotee6448fb] It's all about being thorough. So far he's 35/72. |
|
| Author: | TLK [ Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote8d05e53="Stretch"][quote8d05e53="Raven Hawk"] Ummm, why even scout a punter that low on the list?[/quote8d05e53] It's all about being thorough. So far he's 35/72.[/quote8d05e53] He was number one on my list for pick 7.14. Nice pick Stretch. |
|
| Author: | TLK [ Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I didn't need another RB... but I'm amazed that Neil Warren was still on the board. My scout had him at very overrated, but his bars looked good. I have 87 running backs on my roster, but he'll get more than a shot. |
|
| Author: | JJ Smitty [ Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
And the final pick of the 2014 draft is...... |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quotee30fe67="JJ Smitty"]And the final pick of the 2014 draft is......[/quotee30fe67] ...Mr. Irrlevant 2014: DT Donald Clancy! |
|
| Author: | TurfToe [ Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote72397a9="TLK"]I didn't need another RB... but I'm amazed that Neil Warren was still on the board. My scout had him at very overrated, but his bars looked good. I have 87 running backs on my roster, but he'll get more than a shot.[/quote72397a9] Warren was on my list with about 5 other RB's I didn't have enough picks to get and was hoping he would slip to FA2. |
|
| Author: | nikkelbak [ Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote531a556="TLK"]I didn't need another RB... but I'm amazed that Neil Warren was still on the board. My scout had him at very overrated, but his bars looked good. I have 87 running backs on my roster, but he'll get more than a shot.[/quote531a556] i had my eye on him i was hoping he would go undrafted. i should have knew better, kudos to you, my gamble and loss is your gain, i think he will be very solid. |
|
| Page 16 of 16 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|