[quotef768f15="Fonzie"](keep the Oregon/Chicago deal for Radke in mind). [/quotef768f15]
that trade should be the exception and not the rule. thanks for running up the price on RBs, GI!
http://www.thecfl.us/forum/ |
|
| Toros Trade Block http://www.thecfl.us/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2298 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Fonzie [ Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Toros Trade Block |
K - Rubin Castorena (66/66). Kicker with a [ia7420c8]great[/ia7420c8] leg. If you need someone who can nail 57 yarders, he's your guy. I won't be cutting him, so if you want him make an offer. |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Bump - added Buckley. |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Tue Apr 04, 2006 1:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Edit - removed Gilmore. |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Mon Apr 10, 2006 7:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Bump - added Bradley. |
|
| Author: | Joe [ Mon Apr 10, 2006 7:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Toros 2010 Trade |
[quotef768f15="Fonzie"](keep the Oregon/Chicago deal for Radke in mind). [/quotef768f15] that trade should be the exception and not the rule. thanks for running up the price on RBs, GI!
|
|
| Author: | Cotton [ Mon Apr 10, 2006 8:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Toros 2010 Trade |
[quote1cb0d10="Joe"][quote1cb0d10="Fonzie"](keep the Oregon/Chicago deal for Radke in mind). [/quote1cb0d10] that trade should be the exception and not the rule. thanks for running up the price on RBs, GI![/quote1cb0d10]Amen. See my latest block notes. |
|
| Author: | TurfToe [ Mon Apr 10, 2006 8:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
PM me soon Fonzie, as this 6.20 won't be dangling here for too long and it's burning a hole in my pocket besides...  Depending on how Bradley's physical turns out, I may need a conditional nacho and Slurpee from 7-Eleven on top of it. |
|
| Author: | dberner30 [ Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Toros 2010 Trade |
[quotef516679="P. Luxx"][quotef516679="Joe"][quotef516679="Fonzie"](keep the Oregon/Chicago deal for Radke in mind). [/quotef516679] that trade should be the exception and not the rule. thanks for running up the price on RBs, GI![/quotef516679]Amen. See my latest block notes.[/quotef516679] Get it while you can. 
|
|
| Author: | Cotton [ Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Toros 2010 Trade |
[quotefb6172f="dberner30"][quotefb6172f="P. Luxx"][quotefb6172f="Joe"][quotefb6172f="Fonzie"](keep the Oregon/Chicago deal for Radke in mind). [/quotefb6172f] that trade should be the exception and not the rule. thanks for running up the price on RBs, GI![/quotefb6172f]Amen. See my latest block notes.[/quotefb6172f] Get it while you can. [/quotefb6172f]Oh, definitely! I don't want to come off as being too critical of the move, because different strategies, opinions, and priorities are what make this game so much fun! From my perspective, I inherited a team with almost no draft picks and 14 roster spots to fill, so naturally, I'm going to be more cautious with my cap room than others might be. If the Ice make a run for the title, then all the naysayers will look stupid... and for me, that's not a huge leap to make. Still learning!
|
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Toros 2010 Trade |
[quote1cb0d10="Joe"][quote1cb0d10="Fonzie"](keep the Oregon/Chicago deal for Radke in mind). [/quote1cb0d10] that trade should be the exception and not the rule. thanks for running up the price on RBs, GI![/quote1cb0d10]If that's what the market will bear, then so be it!  As I said, if I can't get something good for Bradley, then he's staying put. But a team in need of a high quality, cheap starting RB should give him a look. But to clarify - I'm not looking for a deal [i1cb0d10]quite[/i1cb0d10] as rich as the Chicago/Oregon deal. That was just plain silly. |
|
| Author: | Joe [ Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'd rather stick to poaching RBs on the FA market than pay what GI did. 
|
|
| Author: | dberner30 [ Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Toros 2010 Trade |
[quote920b08b="Fonzie"] As I said, if I can't get something good for Bradley, then he's staying put. But a team in need of a high quality, cheap starting RB should give him a look. But to clarify - I'm not looking for a deal [i920b08b]quite[/i920b08b] as rich as the Chicago/Oregon deal. That was just plain silly.[/quote920b08b] I wouldnt go that far. Radke is a very good back. And to top it off he is signed at very good price for his talent level. If you drafted the back on the board at 1-9 he wouldnt be as good as Radke and he would cost a hell of a lot more. I had two stud RBs and didnt need Radke or I would have featured him. Cant let him get in the way of Brady's run to destiny as the all time leading rusher in the CFL. He needs to pad those stats over the next few years while my young QB learns the ropes. 
|
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Bump for the other Daryl. |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Wed Apr 12, 2006 8:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Added draft picks. |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Edit: Buckley and Bradley are off the market. Added asking price for Cassidy. |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Bump for receivers. |
|
| Author: | Raven Hawk [ Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ahhh - good ol' Mack Ramirez. I might be tempted if I didn't have a log jam of similar receivers at the position already. Always hate to see a former draftee go. |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Tue May 09, 2006 12:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Bump for Castorena. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|