http://www.thecfl.us/forum/

Week 13 total offens
http://www.thecfl.us/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2608
Page 1 of 1

Author:  timmynausea [ Fri Jun 16, 2006 10:50 am ]
Post subject:  Week 13 total offens

Offense minus defense:
[img9d5db89]http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f220/ ... k13tot.gif[/img9d5db89]

Author:  timmynausea [ Fri Jun 16, 2006 10:51 am ]
Post subject: 

Offense:
[img4c5a392]http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f220/ ... 3off-1.gif[/img4c5a392]

Defense:
[img4c5a392]http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f220/ ... 3def-1.gif[/img4c5a392]

Author:  TurfToe [ Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:26 pm ]
Post subject: 

Dumb question: Are these numbers the average to date (Week 13) or are they Week 13 numbers?

Author:  fantastic flying froggies [ Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:49 pm ]
Post subject: 

[quote505cd54="TurfToe"]Dumb question: Are these numbers the average to date (Week 13) or are they Week 13 numbers?[/quote505cd54]

Dumb question indeed.

Let's take a quick look at your own stats: Las Vegas has 300[b505cd54].2[/b505cd54] yards of total offense.

If this is not an average, explain to me how you got those 0.2 yards...

Author:  timmynausea [ Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:27 pm ]
Post subject: 

[quotef99f85a="TurfToe"]Dumb question: Are these numbers the average to date (Week 13) or are they Week 13 numbers?[/quotef99f85a]

It's the average to date with sack yardage factored into the passing column.

Author:  TurfToe [ Fri Jun 16, 2006 10:03 pm ]
Post subject: 

[quotea61b789="fantastic flying froggies"][quotea61b789="TurfToe"]Dumb question: Are these numbers the average to date (Week 13) or are they Week 13 numbers?[/quotea61b789]

Dumb question indeed.

Let's take a quick look at your own stats: Las Vegas has 300[ba61b789].2[/ba61b789] yards of total offense.

If this is not an average, explain to me how you got those 0.2 yards...[/quotea61b789]

Well, let's see. First, my QB makes a throw to his receiver and he catches it, but wait, his arm is broken in three places and is now 8 inches shorter, placing him on the injury report, again, and he is only able to gain yards in fractions, or for those in third world countries like France who use the Metric system, in tenths of yards, even though football (not soccer but football) is a game of inches and everything is measured in yards. Still with me? I know it's a run-on but that's how good I am. So, like I was saying, my receiver is only able to gain yards in partial increments. Then my TE has his foot removed by a ferocious tackle. He's now less than 100% but able to remain in the game with his "broken tibia". Despite the blood and carnage, he manages to trot off 1.7 yards at a time, which is weird, because even at 1.7 yards per 'stride' it doesn't go evenly into any amount that ends in your gracefully highlight [ba61b789].2[/ba61b789] amount. Maybe it's rounded? Maybe it was a computing error? Oh wait, here it is, I have the game film right here. Yup, that explains it. Yes indeed. There seems to have been an "equipment malfunction" on one of Jennings runs and his penis flopped out. Looks to be about .2 yards on this footage.

Your heritage is not your fault, just your handicap. Being you is not your fault, it's how you are wired. Being an ass hat is simply a reflection on us as a society. Sharing your thoughts is a choice and completely inexcusable.

Dude, I told you it was a dumb question but it was really just a poorly worded way for me to ask how he calculates his numbers. My bad. Now if you don't mind going back to playing hide-and-go-fuck-yourself the rest of us can continue our intellectual discussion of important stuff.

Ok, who am I kidding, this is a TurfToe post. 1[ba61b789].2[/ba61b789] TurfToe posts to be exact. :wink:

Author:  thater [ Sat Jun 17, 2006 12:06 am ]
Post subject: 

damn, TT, have 36 or so different guys hit the injury report atleast once and you get all pissy on us. Wait, you were kinda like that before, I retract .56 of this statement. :twisted:

Author:  TurfToe [ Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:24 pm ]
Post subject: 

[quote5cf5faa="thater"]damn, TT, have 36 or so different guys hit the injury report atleast once and you get all pissy on us. Wait, you were kinda like that before, I retract .56 of this statement. :twisted:[/quote5cf5faa]

Now we're talking inches again. Now that you've put your .56 inches back in your pants, let's talk about those who haven't hit the injury report for me yet. I'm betting at least 2 more new names hit it this week.

Hey, I said put it back. Stop playing with it. Now you need to retract .75 inches of it. Perv!

Author:  thater [ Sun Jun 18, 2006 4:54 pm ]
Post subject: 

[quote6bb50eb="TurfToe"][quote6bb50eb="thater"]damn, TT, have 36 or so different guys hit the injury report atleast once and you get all pissy on us. Wait, you were kinda like that before, I retract .56 of this statement. :twisted:[/quote6bb50eb]

Now we're talking inches again. Now that you've put your .56 inches back in your pants, let's talk about those who haven't hit the injury report for me yet. I'm betting at least 2 more new names hit it this week.

Hey, I said put it back. Stop playing with it. Now you need to retract .75 inches of it. Perv![/quote6bb50eb]

*how does he know this about me?* Um, did I say that out loud?

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC-07:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/