http://www.thecfl.us/forum/ |
|
| 2011 Week 10 total o http://www.thecfl.us/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2862 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | timmynausea [ Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | 2011 Week 10 total o |
Offense minus defense: [img5495fbf]http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f220/ ... k10tot.gif[/img5495fbf] |
|
| Author: | timmynausea [ Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Offense: [img9dae562]http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f220/ ... k10off.gif[/img9dae562] Defense: [img9dae562]http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f220/ ... k10def.gif[/img9dae562] |
|
| Author: | timmynausea [ Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I pointed out Memphis as major overachievers last week. How about Baltimore and New Orleans for underachiever of the year candidates? Statistically, they are top 5 teams, but N.O. is 4-6 and Baltimore is 3-6. 19 interceptions have killed New Orleans, while Baltimore's offense hasn't racked up points to match their yardage output. They are the number one offense in yardage but 7th in scoring. |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Thu Sep 21, 2006 9:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote3868bd3="timmynausea"]I pointed out Memphis as major overachievers last week. How about Baltimore and New Orleans for underachiever of the year candidates? Statistically, they are top 5 teams, but N.O. is 4-6 and Baltimore is 3-6. 19 interceptions have killed New Orleans, while Baltimore's offense hasn't racked up points to match their yardage output. They are the number one offense in yardage but 7th in scoring.[/quote3868bd3] I agree with those two picks for contenders for the Underachiever Of The Year Award, but I'd throw San Antonio into that mix as well. Yardage-wise they're about average, but somehow they've managed just a 1-8 record. |
|
| Author: | timmynausea [ Thu Sep 21, 2006 10:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote9a46175="Fonzie"] I agree with those two picks for contenders for the Underachiever Of The Year Award, but I'd throw San Antonio into that mix as well. Yardage-wise they're about average, but somehow they've managed just a 1-8 record.[/quote9a46175] Good call. They've had a ton of bad luck this year. The curse of the Toothpick? Perhaps. From a talent perspective, Tulsa has probably had the most disappointing year. The Franchise Value screen rates their roster as the second best in the league, and they are 3-6. |
|
| Author: | fantastic flying froggies [ Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
woohoo! Back in positive yards! (quite possibly the first time this season too...) |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|
