[quotec1c9162="dberner30"]i suspect Chicago as high as 12 is a rare event if not a first.[/quotec1c9162]
You don't have to be so glum about it.
http://www.thecfl.us/forum/ |
|
| FFF Rankings - week http://www.thecfl.us/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2900 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | fantastic flying froggies [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | FFF Rankings - week |
[listde7007f][*de7007f]Hartford finishes #1 for second consecutive season - can the Attack also repeat as Champions? [*de7007f]Tucson Toros still a big #2... [*de7007f]Seattle downs still Lin-less Boise, steal division title from Stampede and #3 place in rankings [*de7007f]All Top 10 teams are playoff bound [*de7007f]Memphis worst ranked team to make playoffs at #22 [*de7007f]Honolulu best ranked team to stay home for playoffs at #11 [*de7007f]At #6, highest finish ever for Boston franchise[/listde7007f] [imgde7007f]http://gaillardpatrick.free.fr/FOF_Leag ... 011_17.jpg[/imgde7007f] Best possible score: 135 pts Worst possible score: -134 pts |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 1:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FFF Rankings - w |
[quote03f42eb="fantastic flying froggies"][list03f42eb] [*03f42eb]Tucson Toros still a big #2...[/list03f42eb][/quote03f42eb] WOOHOO! We're number two. NUMBER TWO, BABY! [quote03f42eb="fantastic flying froggies"][list03f42eb][*03f42eb]Honolulu best ranked team to stay home for playoffs at #11 [/list03f42eb][/quote03f42eb] And the RoF holds that distinction for the second straight year. I'm just glad it isn't [i03f42eb]me[/i03f42eb] on the outside looking in this year. Thanks for your efforts again this season, fff. I always look forward to your rankings! |
|
| Author: | thater [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FFF Rankings - w |
[quote2651264="fantastic flying froggies"] Memphis worst ranked team to make playoffs at #22 [/quote2651264] Is that the worst ever in the history of the FFF rankings, I knew they could set some kinda record this year. |
|
| Author: | dberner30 [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 5:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i suspect Chicago as high as 12 is a rare event if not a first. |
|
| Author: | TurfToe [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quotec1c9162="dberner30"]i suspect Chicago as high as 12 is a rare event if not a first.[/quotec1c9162] You don't have to be so glum about it.
|
|
| Author: | SkyDog [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FFF Rankings - w |
[quote1bb9155="fantastic flying froggies"]Honolulu best ranked team to stay home for playoffs at #11[/quote1bb9155]This is of no comfort whatsoever. 
|
|
| Author: | TurfToe [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FFF Rankings - w |
[quote1f1dce9="SkyDog"][quote1f1dce9="fantastic flying froggies"]Honolulu best ranked team to stay home for playoffs at #11[/quote1f1dce9]This is of no comfort whatsoever. [/quote1f1dce9]Interesting. SD = SkyDog = San Diego = Best Team Staying Home Yes, very interesting...almost parallel, ironic, and strange. |
|
| Author: | thater [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FFF Rankings - w |
[quote724b5c3="TurfToe"][quote724b5c3="SkyDog"][quote724b5c3="fantastic flying froggies"]Honolulu best ranked team to stay home for playoffs at #11[/quote724b5c3]This is of no comfort whatsoever. [/quote724b5c3]Interesting. SD = SkyDog = San Diego = Best Team Staying Home Yes, very interesting...almost parallel, ironic, and strange.[/quote724b5c3] Dammit, how many f'ing times do I have to correct you sumbitches about your logic sequences. In the order you should have put it in, TT: [b724b5c3]SkyDog = SD[/b724b5c3] = San Diego = Best Team Staying Home. TT, you are the star of trash talk in this league, YOU CANNOT HAVE OFF DAYS, DAMMIT. Once you step up, you cannot step down. We look up to you, man; then we look down to make sure we didn't catch anything. |
|
| Author: | TurfToe [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FFF Rankings - w |
[quotea0fb2b9="thater"][quotea0fb2b9="TurfToe"][quotea0fb2b9="SkyDog"][quotea0fb2b9="fantastic flying froggies"]Honolulu best ranked team to stay home for playoffs at #11[/quotea0fb2b9]This is of no comfort whatsoever. [/quotea0fb2b9]Interesting. SD = SkyDog = San Diego = Best Team Staying Home Yes, very interesting...almost parallel, ironic, and strange.[/quotea0fb2b9] Dammit, how many f'ing times do I have to correct you sumbitches about your logic sequences. In the order you should have put it in, TT: [ba0fb2b9]SkyDog = SD[/ba0fb2b9] = San Diego = Best Team Staying Home. TT, you are the star of trash talk in this league, YOU CANNOT HAVE OFF DAYS, DAMMIT. Once you step up, you cannot step down. We look up to you, man; then we look down to make sure we didn't catch anything.[/quotea0fb2b9] I think I just got pwned.  Gold star for thater 
|
|
| Author: | fantastic flying froggies [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quotea2dfbd9="dberner30"]i suspect Chicago as high as 12 is a rare event if not a first.[/quotea2dfbd9] You suspect correctly, that is indeed your highest ever finish. Your previous best was #20, achieved in the first year of the rankings, i.e. 2005. |
|
| Author: | fantastic flying froggies [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FFF Rankings - w |
[quotee363adb="thater"][quotee363adb="fantastic flying froggies"] Memphis worst ranked team to make playoffs at #22 [/quotee363adb] Is that the worst ever in the history of the FFF rankings, I knew they could set some kinda record this year.[/quotee363adb] That is indeed the worst ever. Previous owner of this 'not much to brag about' award was the New Orleans franchise (they were the Breakers back then, no?) in 2006, with a modest #19. Unlike Memphis, at 8-8, they also did not have a losing record. |
|
| Author: | TurfToe [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
A request for FFF or Timmy: What was the biggest turn around or flop in league history? I am asking based on my 1-14-1 performance last year and my 10-6 performance this year. Just wanted to know where I stand in CFL historical relevance...oh, and to make sure I'm not the poor slob with the biggest flop (reads: hope it wasn't LVS 2009 to 2010). It's hard to believe injuries/health took us from 10-6 to 1-14-1 to 10-6 over the past 3 seasons. |
|
| Author: | fantastic flying froggies [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Without checking in game, the first one that comes to mind is the Detroit Vampires turnaround, from 1-15 in 2003 to 10-6 in 2004 (after a change of ownership, I might add  ), so I beat you by 1/2 a game! 
|
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote73d0c35="fantastic flying froggies"] so I beat you by 1/2 a game! [/quote73d0c35]I'd prefer that you beat him with a baseball bat. |
|
| Author: | 3ric [ Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
We are the best team with a losing record! Wo-hoo! 
|
|
| Author: | TurfToe [ Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote953a7b7="Fonzie"][quote953a7b7="fantastic flying froggies"] so I beat you by 1/2 a game! [/quote953a7b7]I'd prefer that you beat him with a baseball bat.[/quote953a7b7] You'd prefer that you at least had a 1/2 of a baseball bat. Stubby. Rmember, you're still #2. |
|
| Author: | Taco [ Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
And the top 8 teams are the 8 teams still alive in the playoffs. And we're #8. Doesn't give me much confidence, but then again, I never thought I'd make it this far this season. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|