http://www.thecfl.us/forum/ |
|
| Week 13 is complete http://www.thecfl.us/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5609 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Fonzie [ Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Week 13 is complete |
League File Results Teams making transactions: CHI Teams adjusting rosters: ARI Teams shuffling depth charts: ARI, CHI Upcoming Schedule: ------------------ 31-Dec Week 14 Regular Season 4-Jan Week 15 Regular Season 7-Jan Week 16 Regular Season 11-Jan Week 17 Regular Season |
|
| Author: | Marven [ Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
GG Fonzie, We become the first team to clinch our division. Home field can play a role when it's cold in Denver. I hope to see you in the playoffs. |
|
| Author: | Fonzie [ Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Curses! Perfection denied. And not only that, but this could end up being a very costly loss as Denver now owns the head-to-head tiebreaker over us for homefield advantage in the playoffs. Alas. At least we lost to a very worthy opponent, one who has historically given us fits. gg Marven! |
|
| Author: | fantastic flying froggies [ Tue Dec 29, 2009 7:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
We rumble over New Orleans. After a disastrous start(down 10-0, absolutely nothing going, penalties galore, big plays for the Horde, missed chip shot FG, etc...), we recover and completely dominate NO in just about every possible stat to whip 'em 34-10. This was a test match for us against a very strong opponent, and we had a great game. To top things off, Albany lost to Durham giving us a nice cushion in the division race. |
|
| Author: | Hoosier [ Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Run game looked very potent for us, but the passing game is still anemic...profoundly so. A different qb with 16 formations saw improvement, but only from a qb rating of 40 plus to 60 plus. Just pathetic play at qb. Good game Long Beach... |
|
| Author: | JJ Smitty [ Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
WOW, we got a 85yd td fumble return from our NT.. I believe that was the different. GG Masked BTW, I'm guessing the new logo's sparked up my team.. |
|
| Author: | Masked [ Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quoted10cad8="JJ Smitty"]WOW, we got a 85yd td fumble return from our NT.. I believe that was the different. GG Masked BTW, I'm guessing the new logo's sparked up my team..[/quoted10cad8] The two long TD returns for your defense turned what could have been a blow out in my favor into one in your favor. Good game. |
|
| Author: | Berger23 [ Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
gg Taco. Hopefully someday my team will be able to get it going down the stretch in the clutch parts of the game. neither the offense nor defense came through when we could use a boost. Interesting stat: Runs left and right 11 ypc - 5.5 Runs up the middle 16 ypc - 1.8 Too bad the coaches couldn't figure that out during the game. Nevertheless, good game. |
|
| Author: | fantastic flying froggies [ Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote41dffcd="Hoosier"]Run game looked very potent for us, but the passing game is still anemic...profoundly so. A different qb with 16 formations saw improvement, but only from a qb rating of 40 plus to 60 plus. Just pathetic play at qb. Good game Long Beach...[/quote41dffcd] Maybe your passing game's anemia has more to do with both your starting WRs sitting on the bench due to injury than with your QB, don't you think? Justin Garner should be decent, if nothing special. It'll be interesting to see how he does now that your star WR Reeves gets back in the lineup. |
|
| Author: | Hoosier [ Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[quote4cce09c="fantastic flying froggies"][quote4cce09c="Hoosier"]Run game looked very potent for us, but the passing game is still anemic...profoundly so. A different qb with 16 formations saw improvement, but only from a qb rating of 40 plus to 60 plus. Just pathetic play at qb. Good game Long Beach...[/quote4cce09c] Maybe your passing game's anemia has more to do with both your starting WRs sitting on the bench due to injury than with your QB, don't you think? Justin Garner should be decent, if nothing special. It'll be interesting to see how he does now that your star WR Reeves gets back in the lineup.[/quote4cce09c] Yeah, two weeks in a row one of the star wideouts has been out, so it hasn't been very fair. Garner had nine formations under his belt, I benched him, and patched the game.. now he's up to twelve. He'll definitely get a look see now. (why it's up to twelve now, I haven't the foggiest). I'll definitely need to draft a good young wideout early in the draft to shore up that part of the offense. And a running back. Smile. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|