[quotea01ae05="Fonzie"][quotea01ae05="JJ Smitty"]http://fof.sportplanet.gamespy.com/foru ... hp?t=62697
There's a gameplan bug with Version 6.1a, I think we should go back to 6.1 until this gets fixed..[/quotea01ae05]
This bug certainly explains the alarming frequency of goal-line defense usage. And I must say that this is the kind of shit that makes me want to throw a big  at Jim G. Holy JEEBUS this is a stupid bug.
That said, the workaround is pretty simple, so I'd rather we stick with 6.1a and wait for 6.1b (which I'm guessing will be coming quickly, given the [ba01ae05]egregious[/ba01ae05] nature of this bug).[/quotea01ae05]
Dude, you said egregious. Can't players get ejected for egregious hits nowadays? They should call it that, player ejected for egregious foul. Yet flagrant foul sounds better because of the alliteration, so egregious encroachment would sound coolio. But then encroachment would need to be called something else, like offsides with contact. However, alliteration would run rampant as alliteration often occurs (see what I mean?). So encroachment would be accidental acquaintance, invalid intercourse, mistaken meeting, or illegal impact.
See what you did Fonz, what a mess. Leave the big words for the educated and just edit your post. I vote for nefarious, deplorable, or the old standby - flagrant.
Maybe mines working fine since I double patched, right wade?
|